Tom Hanks Has Nothing to Do with My Milk Sickness Metaphor
I’m determined. Apparently. I spent more than an hour this morning trying to photo-match and confirm the name of one flower, just to ensure my blog is accurate. I hate writing “tiny white flowers” if I can describe it more accurately, and in this case more interestingly, like “poisonous white snakeroot.” (I need to do a whole blog on why all the photo-matching sites can be so frustrating. Or you can…have at it.)
All this to tell you that last weekend I took a walk along a section of Coshocton’s beautiful River Trail. I was not yet thinking of Tom Hanks, Milk Sickness or my metaphor. Or perhaps the latter, because aren’t we always thinking in metaphor?
I was enjoying the flowers of early autumn: white and purple asters, goldenrod and those tiny white flowers you see increasingly along the edges of roads and recently disturbed fields. In looking for the name of those flowers later, I came across what I think is a match: a lethally poisonous plant called White Snakeroot. It seems, according to a site called The Eupatorium Story, “This plant is infamous for causing thousands of deaths of early colonists, as well as much livestock. This was especially true in the Ohio River Valley around the early to mid-1800’s. In humans, the disease was eventually named ‘milk sickness’, in other animals ‘the trembles’.”
Here I was planning a lovely blog about autumn in Coshocton and now I’m obsessing over “milk sickness” in the mid-1800s. Well, I suppose at least it’s still regional, in that most of the deaths were in the Ohio River Valley, but even more interestingly, it seems that one of the most infamous cases of death by flower relates to the mother of Abraham Lincoln: Nancy Hanks Lincoln.
How did she die from this plant, you ask?
Well, apparently (you might have guessed by the nickname) from drinking milk of a poisoned animal. Animals get a disease called trembles, and it passes into their milk and then into humans, in what was aptly called milk sickness, and killed off as much as 50% of the ORV region population in the mid-1800s. What the…?
Could I get milk sickness today??? I’m not a big milk drinker, but I’m a big curiosity-killed-the-cat (or at least an entire morning of blogging) person.
I read in the Spring 2012 newsletter from Purdue university, “This plant causes skeletal muscle necrosis and cardiotoxicity in livestock and grazing animals that ingest snakeroot at as little as 0.5-2% of their body weight. The plant toxins are also excreted in milk, therefore, suckling animals can also be susceptible to poisoning.”
Next I read an article in the St. Cloud Times. The title is about as boring as a newspaper headline can get: “Little plant, big impact.” But that opening line packs a punch: “What do actor Tom Hanks, dairy cows and Abraham Lincoln have in common?”
Ooh, now I’m really interested. Tom Hanks too? Then I continue reading. You know, in craft courses, you learn about creating a great introductory sentence to draw in your readers. But you also learn that you better fulfill that contract you set up. For me, St. Cloud bombed this one. My expectation as a reader was this: since the article was about White Snakeroot, Tom Hanks’ connection was to the subject, the plant, not to the trivia that he was related to Abraham Lincoln’s mother. So, um, yeah, technically they all have poor, dead, Nancy Hanks Lincoln in common, but really, St. Cloud? Great setup. Lame execution. It ends with asking me to contemplate the “six degrees of separation” between all parties mentioned in the article, its impact on American history and what I should think while looking at the plant.
All right, well, I have to admit to an admiration for this last bit about the degrees of separation. Kudos to Professor Saupe (article writer) for that connection.
HOWEVER (and this is a key “however”) the game is really inauthentic without finishing by connecting Tom Hanks back to Kevin Bacon in Apollo 13, in which there was no milk sickness or white snakeroot. Of course, there is an Apollo 13 Drinking Game which, if played correctly, can cause alcohol sickness.
However, to honor the sensationalism of the article’s opening line, I think I’ll re-title my blog from its presently lame “Clinging to Summer” to the now hook-y “Tom Hanks has Nothing to Do with My Milk Sickness Metaphor.” Done. Thank you. I will suckle the readers as well, and perhaps cruelly drag in some starry-eyed Tom Hanks fan, only to betray them with anecdotal trivia later on. And, surprisingly, I’ll be okay with that. And as usual, I’ll forgive my initial reaction to St. Cloud and actually appreciate the idea.
Back to execution, you say? Can white snakeroot still kill me today? I’m getting there. But first, I’m thinking maybe a better title for that article could have been “Love in the time of Milk Sickness” and we could ponder just how far the trickle-down impact of milk sickness could go.
What about PASTEURIZATION, right? I bet you’ve been shouting that word at me for some time and if you have, maybe you even have a little smarmy-face on that I’ve just now gotten around to addressing it, right? Well I was gleefully surprised to read that according to another lovely newsletter from Purdue, “the poison tremetol is not inactivated by pasteurization.”
Hooray! As an avid proponent of raw milk (milked correctly and sanitarily, of course) I’m happy to continue my pursuit of healthy bacteria without the added concern of milk sickness (er, if and when I actually drink milk, that is).
Thankfully for the people of the 1800s, there was the legend/fact/historical figure-turned myth, Dr. Anna Bixby, who discovered the origins of milk sickness. Apparently she went into the woods searching for a cause, ran into some Native American healer lady who had already known the answer from having, well, generations of knowledge about her country, was nice enough to pass the knowledge on to Dr. Anna, who passed it on to soldiers and friends, neighbors and passersby.
Of course the story of Anna Bixby goes beyond just the milk sickness diagnosis. There’s a whole weird scenario surrounding a cave, whiskey bootlegging, murder, ghosts, etc. on a site called Prairie Ghosts.
But Dr. Anna herself was kind of amazing, really. In this post by Northern Illinois University, it describes “Dr. Anna wanted to test this for herself. When she fed the white snakeroot to a calf, it soon developed the sickness. Other calves not fed the snakeroot remained healthy.”
Such a fascinating study. I wonder if such a thing could be applied to the study of other natural plants and on a much larger scale. I wonder if such a thing could be applied to the medicinal aspects of plants as well. Naw, can’t be. If we could study the medicinal properties of plants in the same way double-blind studies are done on synthetic pharmaceuticals, we would have already done so. Sheesh. What was I thinking?
“Anna started a snakeroot eradication program to eliminate the poisonous herb from the area. She encouraged men and boys to search the woods and fields, uprooting and burning all of the white snake-root that they could find. The program lasted for three years throughout the summer and fall. At the end of the program, the weed and the disease had been virtually eliminated from southeastern Illinois.”
Wait a minute. An eradication program? In the mid-1800s? Without pesticides? What a tedious way to solve the problem: pulling weeds by hand as they appear. Who wants to do something like that when chemicals can be applied for a faster result?
In another thought, am I the only one who wonders whether or not the old Native American healer did the right thing in giving away that knowledge to the people who would wipe hers out? Was Dr. Anna stupid in not finding a way to profit from her knowledge instead of giving it away, only to have a bunch of old men give official credence to the plant’s toxicity nearly 70 years later?
Oops – silly me. I was interpreting and paraphrasing that story. I suppose you should have the opportunity to read it without my summary and suggestion.
Wait, if Dr. Anna and her crew had early success eradicating white snakeroot in the mid-1800s, why is it still prevalent today? Why is it more prevalent? Didn’t America just adopt the practice of continuing to pull these deadly plants as they appeared?
And if the plants are still here, and pasteurization isn’t killing off the toxin, why why aren’t we still getting sick? If this white snakeroot is so common (and it is – just look at this USDA distribution map) then why aren’t we all milking ourselves to death? According to Purdue again (go Purdue! um, apparently) “human disease is uncommon today due to current practices of animal husbandry and the pooling of milk from many producers.”
“Animal husbandry?” That’s kind of a generic catch-all, don’t you think? What do they mean by that? Are they running around cow-tipping Bessie to keep her from tasting some pretty little white flowers she noticed over by the fence? Are they crop-blasting her big, beautiful cow arse in an attempt to kill off the bad weeds? Egads this rabbit hole just never ends!
Aha – maybe the people at Goat World have the answer. This is how they recommend husbanding goats to avoid consumption: “Learn to recognize and avoid white snakeroot. Do not allow animals to graze this plant under any circumstance. To do this, fence off wooded areas, provide supplemental feed (especially in the late fall and winter), or treat the snakeroot with herbicides. Be cautioned that treatment with herbicides may make the plant more palatable, so allow several weeks to pass between spraying and allowing animal access (be sure the plants are completely dead). The problem may recur the following year, so plan ahead to avoid animal loss. Under no circumstances should raw milk from affected animals be used for animal or human consumption. “
Okay, wait a minute…”Under no circumstances should raw milk from…” I think somebody at Goat World needs to hook up with a certain scientist from Purdue, because that shiznet about raw milk has been debunked, fella. You can still diss the bacteria, but not the milk sickness. I’m just sayin…
And wait another minute. “HERBICIDES MAY MAKE THE PLANT MORE PALATABLE” – HUH? Spraying plants with toxic chemicals may be TASTY to animals? Hmmm – now doesn’t that seem counterintuitive? So spraying to kill the plants attracts animals to eat already poisonous plants, now loaded with bio-toxins as well. That’s weird, I always thought herbicides were so safe. (Oops just caught myself in smarmy-face.)
All I know is that I’m glad we stopped just pulling out all those plants by hand and discovered the joys of chemistry. Life is just too busy to pull weeds all day. And in this day and age, I can’t imagine any group of people who would be willing to come in and pull weeds by hand for what would amount to immigration-level pay. Oh wait.
No, I’d rather take a bottle of Round-Up and apply liberally. I’m sure the goats and cows will just process that stuff right out. I’m not a big milk drinker myself, but you go ahead. I’m sure it’s safe. After all, it’s pasteurized.
Here’s another question: Am I the only one who also wonders, in reading things like this, why livestock haven’t evolved any ability to detect the poisonous nature of the plant and avoid it?
Apparently, I am not.
According to Springfield Plateau, in their scintillatingly titled article “White Snakeroot,” “Much like their exotic European human counterparts, cattle and horses lacked the knowledge of their new surroundings and will eat it freely. How many thousand years might it take for cows to “learn” to avoid snake root?”
Indeed! Go on…
In fact, they did not go on. That question was thrown out with no further attempt to resolve it. Many. Thousand. Years. Really? Our buddy Craig, who raises goats, has never had his goats croak from white snakeroot. Granted, he hadn’t heard of white snakeroot until I showed him a photo and told him about it, but his goats graze freely in areas of multiple vegetation. Why aren’t they eating this poisonous plant and kicking it by the dozens?
Has anybody actually ever asked Bessie WHY she ate the white snakeroot? Tried to get inside her head? Let’s see.
I’m Bessie the cow. I’m foraging. I’m foraging. I’m foraging. I’m running out of grass and nummy alfalfa. That darn Brutus is hogging the rest of the thistle and knapweed. What’s this? Smells funny. Looks like crap. But I’m starving and I can’t get outside this fence to eat anything else. Nom. Nom. Nom. Accck.
Yeah, okay, so a little hyperbolic today, but seriously? However do animals survive without our intervention? If it will really take “many thousand years” for animals to learn to avoid white snakeroot, how have they survived this long. Let’s see. So the problem with livestock is that Europeans introduced them here, so they haven’t had time to adapt to avoiding white snakeroot, so we need to continuously protect them from themselves.
Maybe the problem is in looking at this using the word “evolution” instead of the word “adaptation.” According to Texas A&M University, “Animals raised in pastures with the plant avoid it and are seldom poisoned. Introducing naive goats to the plant in the spring has caused death losses of more than 90 percent.”
Aha! So our buddy Craig and his smart goats are winning this round. He, apparently has smart goats.
I don’t think it would have been that difficult for Springfield Plateau to find that out either, considering the Google search consisted of my highly evolved brain entering the words “animals avoid white snakeroot.”
At least give a hypothesis, an anecdote; tell me that Tom Hanks’ fifth-cousin Flannery Hanks was trampled by the second cousin of an ancestor of Kevin Bacon, who brought those early cows to America.
All righty ladies and germs, now the exam:
Question one (From Saupe’s Exam): “Why did many people refuse to accept that milksickness was caused by white snakeroot?”
Question two: How many of these questions by the biology department by our six-degree-loving, now notorious Dr. Saupe can you answer? : http://www.employees.csbsju.edu/ssaupe/biol106/106e1f05.pdf
Question three (and really the only question that counts): (a) Can you identify at least 2 “dead metaphors” in today’s post? (b) “Is there an overarching metaphor to today’s blog, and if so, did you “get” the metaphor, and the ones within it, or shall I bring back some photo-blogs to give our brains a break this week?” 😉 (Hint, this question can’t be fully answered until everything, including pictures and post script, have been accounted for).
What do you think? Are you ill or “ill” informed?
P.S. If you re-read looking for the answer to Number 3, I’m sorry. It was a trick question, because I never gave you that information. The answer is, well, as best I can discover: witches. Apparently folklore was so pervasive that fiction was much easier to swallow. Imagine that.
P.P.S. Comments which do not allow for the assumption of my supreme intelligence and deadly irony (or that can effectively play a trump card attesting to my total deficit of said assets) will not be approved.